Ghost Hunters S06E07 - Inn of the Dead reviewed

I note they were STILL sticking with the flashlights thing after we openly debunked it last week and said here it wouldnt be accepted as proof of paranormal (its merely the plain old boring normal) and we also said it'd be unacceptable to present it as even vaguely paranormal. You think Pilgrim would read this forum then do a bit of creative editing on the fly to no longer include this in any further shows no its been officially and very scientifically debunked as plain old ARCING.

I do agree the Ghost Hunters must have super hearing, Jason & Grant hearing a scream which wasn't audible on the show, also Britts shushing noise in the bar. What was VERY annoying was how they cut away from Joe Chinns camera JUST as he was pointing it at the "bang" in room 5 also Jay & Grants "looked like something walked towards the door" convieniently behind the cameraman filming them and NOT what they were looking at. Another thing we constantly berate them for yet they never try to address or fix.

During the reveal yet again they presented a personal experience with no physical proof that Jason, Grant & the cameraman heard but they had nothing on tape. Yet again Jay & Grant showing themselves to be worse than rookie investigators. 1st rule of evidence presentation is to have ACTUAL evidence to present, NOT a personal experience which can be discounted as hearsay.

They even then have the cheek to present the tape of Jay & Grant being filmed seeing that "something" that walked towards the door BEHIND a cameraman. This has to be the worst example of presenting something you do NOT have physical proof of, way to make yourselves look like rank amateurs guys. Grant claims he was filming it and "the IR was too strong to pick up the subtle differences". In other words Grant you captured nothing and presented hearsay yet again.

They also present the "womans scream" where all you can hear is one of the 3 people in the room breathing slightly loudly, no scream so yet again another case of presenting a personal experience as evidence. They also present the lights as evidence of paranormal which we know its not.

The only real piece of evidence was an EVP either saying get me down or let me out.

Guys you do realise by now ANY shred of respect we may have had for you in the past has been completely destroyed by pulling stuff like this. You CAN NOT present personally experiences as evidence. Unless its on camera or audio tape it is NOT evidence and can NOT be presented to the client at all. 3 people having the same experience is NOT proof. Stick to the rules you yourselves created, go back and review them in older seasons if you must. At this juncture in time both Jason & Grant are even making Brian Harnois look positively professional compared to them now.