Reviews of Wrestling, Movies, TV and much more! Strong language has been censored by me for blog content
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Google Chrome - A Warning!
Even if you are only running 1 browser window with no tabs open there are 3 (count them in program manager like I did!) versions of chrome.exe all running at once. And don't think you can get clever and close one of them because closing ANY of them will kill your current browser.
Chrome can and WILL overload your RAM and virtual memory too, especially if you are a player of Flash and SWF games on sites like Kongregate. Today I almost crashed my machine playing Penguinz, Chrome decided it wanted 1.06 gigs (yes, GIGS!) worth of virtual memory to play the game making it so slow it almost stopped. It even requested my full 2 gigs of RAM to try and use as virtual memory. I have now stopped using it until they rewrite the code so when you load 1 browser window you only get 1 instance of chrome.exe running. It also needs to learn how to process memory better.
So be warned! Google Chrome is not as great as its made out to be!
Saturday, March 28, 2009
ROH Wrestling 28th Mar 09 reviewed
Daizee Haze vs Sara Del Rey (with Larry Sweeney) - This is my 3rd time seeing Haze who has previously worked on TNA once (Impact 1st May 08 jobbing to Cheerleader Melissa) & my 2nd time seeing Del Rey (who lost to Haze in a 3 way with Lacey at the 08 Rising Above ROH PPV) so these 2 do have a bit of history. Del Rey was on top initially but Haze made a nice headscissors (I had the feeling it was flubbed by Del Rey due to lack of trust), Haze did flub a dive onto Del Rey who was also out of position for the catch (too far away) & it was quite funny that one of the announcers wasn't able to identify a simple backbreaker.
Haze was selling nicely on the whole but didn't do a very good sell in the Torture Rack off Del Rey, she did however hit a great looking tilt-a-whirl slam, I'm not too sure what the front face slam was but it looked good (like a ddt almost but not quite), the Capo kick off Del Rey would have looked a LOT better if we hadn't been on the overhead camera which totally no-sold what would have otherwise been an awesome looking move and Del Rey took the eventual win off The Royal Butterfly. A fairly decent match with a few flubs but not bad at all.
Alex Payne vs Claudio Castagnoli - I've seen Castagnoli once before against Chris Hero on their 08 Rising Above PPV, he was an ok worker there. Payne had the better start making a couple of nice flip leverage moves which Castagnoli sold well and seemed more than willing to go with. Payne as both the smaller and lighter guy sold the wrong end of a beatdown pretty well and kicked out after a big boot to the head.
Payne got a second wind and hit Castagnoli with a bulldog, Castagnoli came back with a pop-up European Uppercut (which looked bloody awful as if Payne wanted no part of it) before taking the win off the Ricola Bomb. So-so match that Payne really supplied most of the entertainment for.
Jay Briscoe vs Nigel McGuinness - I've seen Briscoe tagging a few times (don't let his name fool you, his real surname is actually Pugh) with his brother & I last saw McGuinness defending his title against Austin Aries in an extremely scrappy match so my hopes weren't really up here. This match was due to be 22 minutes long or there abouts and started very slowly with holds, reversals and a fair bit of mat work so I feared this would be a repeat of last weeks main event where nothing happened until the last few minutes then the ref would have to tell one of the guys to win. Sadly that was exactly the case and most of the decent action came in the final 4 minutes,
Briscoe hit a nice across the ring top rope legdrop but McGuinness took the win out of nowhere off the Jawbreaker Lariat (although I'm not completely sure what he was doing in the ropes before hand). A fairly boring and overly long match with not enough action that wasn't worthy of main event status.
Friday, March 27, 2009
My Weekly TNA Catch-up, Impact 26th Mar 09 reviewed
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
WWE Smackdown 20th Mar 09 (500th Episode) reviewed
Excessively long Wrestlemania Vid, stinks of "we have f**k all talent to fill tonights show" to me.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
ROH Wrestling 21st Mar 09 reviewed
Jacobs was on top from the start for a fair old while until Black got a nice 2nd wind and really turned things around. Both Black & Jacobs started to pull a few aerials as we got down to the last few minutes, I wondered how they were going to finish but Black pulled a wear down move (which is fine if you've got the time but a f**king silly idea when you only have 2 mins left on air) and missed a superkick that Jacobs reversed into a schoolboy roll-up that Black barely kicked out of it but Black took the eventual win off a bridging suplex out of nowhere. Not a great match, they didn't know how to pace it & had to rush the finish.
My Weekly TNA Catch-up, Impact 19th Mar 09 reviewed
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
My TNA Catch-up, Destination X PPV 09
Friday, March 13, 2009
My Weekly TNA Catch-up, Impact 12th Mar 09 reviewed
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Movie Review - Watchmen
Like Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy and Alien 3 this film was in development hell for a very long time before an extended legal battle finally allowed its appearance on the silver screen. It may had made millions in both the US and UK box offices already but its still not a very good movie.
Based on an extremely obscure cult comic book series set in a parallel universe it catalogues the lives of a set of retired super heroes on a world where vigilante super heroes have now been outlawed after 40 years of service to their countries and their planet. Now someone is hunting them down and kills one then frames another for murder, the US is on the brink of Nuclear war with Russia (the movie is set in 1985 where Richard Nixon is serving his 3rd term in office) and the nuclear clock is set at 5 minutes to midnight.The movie constantly moves forwards and backwards in time with no thought given to anyone who has never read the comics or knows nothing about The Watchmen, characters aren't explained very well and one in particular is made to seem very ambiguous about not being a very good person (The Comedian who I actually thought was being played by Robert Downey Jr) as we see him assassinate JFK and help end the Vietnam war, he is also seen to kill American civilians in the 1970's civil unrest race riots and appears to be enjoying his work far too much.
With the constant movement in time you are never exactly sure who is who and what is going on, characters aren't given the chance to develop onscreen much and your going to spend almost all of the over 2 and a half hours of the movies duration being extremely confused.Confused and bored, as the very poorly explained plot (what little there actually is of it) is interspersed with fast action sequences almost immediately followed with long drawn out scenes full of very dull dialogue. Its very badly paced indeed, no thought seems to have given to how the movie should play out and it also seems to have not been cut at all. You get the feeling that what you are watching is everything the director filmed and nothing has been left on the cutting room floor.
The film does show characters like Dr Manhatten (at least you see how he gets his powers) developing a clean alternative to nuclear power & fossil fuels much to the chagrin of various captains of industry, this project is being funded and assisted by the 1st super heroes to ever reveal his real identity Adrian Veidt formerly known as Ozymandias.The film has a few twists and turns which will catch non comic book fans off guard and ends with Russia & America uniting against a common enemy. I wont reveal who that is or any of the twists but if you can follow the film for any longer than 5 minutes at a time then your doing a lot better than I was.
The special effects are amazing but considering the films budget was $150 million they darn well should be, sadly it seems all the money was squandered on effects and nothing went on a decent script or hiring someone to adapt the comic books to a format that the non comic book geek could easily understand.Terry Gilliam said it best when he stated the idea of making Watchmen "was unfilmable" and that by "Reducing the story to a two or two-and-a-half hour film seemed to me to take away the essence of what Watchmen is about.". When someone who made great almost unimaginable movies like 12 Monkeys, Brazil & Baron Munchausen tells you your concept is "unfilmable" then you should really listen to him.
Watchmen is a visual spectacle that is too long, badly cut, exceptionally badly paced and very badly adapted. More could be been done with Rorschachs narration which could have been utilised to explain the characters much better, also to have dropped the original Minutemen from the movie completely as their appearance just confuses the viewer as to who you are watching.I guess if the movie is watched with brain disengaged most viewers will enjoy it on the action and effects alone but will get bored during the quiet moments and start to fidget way before it gets anywhere close to the closing titles. Cutting about 45 minutes out of the film would vastly improve its watchability and pacing, in its current form the nicest thing I can say is that it is bearable but only just. Personally I was left wishing for movies like Howard The Duck & Masters Of The Universe, thats how little I enjoyed this film.
Friday, March 6, 2009
My Weekly TNA Catch-up, 5th Mar 09 reviewed
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Movie review - 5ive (aka Five)
Our cameras then zoom in to the figure of a solitary woman staggering exhausted in the wind to discover a skeleton in a car. She continues alone until finding a town where the church bell is tolling discovering it was only the wind, we also see a newspaper report warning of a new bomb that could potentially wipe out all life on Earth.
Coming across a stilted house (designed by architect Frank Lloyd Wright and owned by the film's director Arch Oboler) she seeks shelter and discovers there is a fire and meets a man, promptly fainting like a typical 50's woman in a badly written role. After coming round he says his name is Michael Rogan and he realises she has some connection to the house as there are photographs of her there.
Rogan describes his end of the world experience in The Empire State Building (clearly the bombs weren't nukes although he mentions radioactive dust so we're clearly dealing with either a lack of knowledge or just plain bad science). She explains she was in an X-ray room in hospital and woke up alone then finally tells us her name is Roseanne (Rogans theory that the walls were lead lined and she survived the radioactivity that way matched my guess) and the house belonged to her Aunt (mothers sister she says).
He takes her on a trip to a local store for food and she freaks out on the way (more evidence of a badly written typically hysterical 50's female role), Rogan also manages to freak her out by showing her a box of "Atomic Suds" washing powder just to reinforce her stereotype a bit further. After pouring out his heart about how he hated New York back at the house he assumes a lot and tries to impose himself on Roseanne leaving her crying hysterically over her dead husband Steven.
Roseanna does start to look visibly pregnant but no mention is made of her condition, Rogan just refers to "it" as though he can't even bring himself to either say baby or pregnant. After telling her the world and everyone in it are dead they both hear a car horn beeping and run to the road to find 2 more men in a jeep who turn out to be Oliver P. Barnstable (thats not how he pronouces it though, who was a former bank cashier) and Charles (who I assumed isn't introduced to the pregnant white lady on account of him being a Negro but was possibly a security guard or commissionaire judging by his unform) who both survived the bombs because they'd been locked in the banks vault.
We don't find out Charles' name until a little later that evening and he politely always refers to Roseanne as Ma'am acting in a very subserviant way reflecting the mood of the time this was made (1951) and no-one ever thinks to ask Charles his surname but Roseanne does ask if he had a family. The conversation between Roseanne & Barnstable shows he hasn't accepted his situation and still thinks everything will return to normal, his comment about his injuries is a rather clear sign of radiation sickness though.
Rogan makes the same diagnosis citing images of Hiroshima as his information source which leaves both him & Charles to start checking themselves for similar symptoms. Rogan & Charles discuss the possibility of getting a generator and Roseanne informs them Barnstaple is awake and wishes to go to the ocean. After the group travel there Rogan asks Roseanne when shes due to give birth (He can't even bring himself to ask that much, just saying "when does" and trailing off there) but she's not sure and thinks 3 months maybe (again reinforcing her as a sterotypically dumb '50s woman).
Whilst reminiscing on the beach they witness a man washed up on the shore who Rogan & Charles drag out of the sea as he is unconcious. After recovering he tells us (in an incredibly silly and impossible to place accent) that he was on Everest, stranded for 5 days before descending and crossing Asia then sailing to Hawaii (thats a journey of over 7000 miles as the crow flies according to Google Earth) before flying a plane to America that ran out of fuel. After finishing his story Charles calls them over to reveal Barnstable had died.
We finally discover our newest group member is called Eric (Roseanne calls him by his name as she is tending to him) and Charles reveals their attempts at agriculture have been successful (In a great goof you can clearly hear birds singing in the background despite the fact that Roseanne had clearly said there were no birds or animals left alive in the previous scene mere moments before).
Charles & Rogan further progress by succeeding with their generator project providing them with music and light but Eric never works and thinks he is above the rest of the group calling the food they eat "swill" (His accent constantly comes as goes as well). Eric also questions why they are all alive (clearly he'd never been told Rogan was aboard an elevator in the middle of The Empire State Building so he'd have the thickness of both building and elevator & shaft to protect him, pretty logical really) stating immunity from the radiation saved them offering a glimmer of hope that others may have also survived.
Rogan tries to act as the logical voice of reason but Eric plays the emotion card stating Roseanne needs to know if her husband is alive or not. After Rogan storms out Charles wonders about travelling to the city as well and Eric reveals he is an ignorant bigot and attacks Charles (which injures Roseane sending her into what I assume was an incredibly badly acted early labour).
After a stormy night we have a wonderful dawn as Charles cites his creation story which ends hearing by a babies crying as the 1st child born into the new world is a boy and Roseanne procrastinates about naming him until she discovers the fate of his probably dead father.
Eric returns from his extremely short self imposed exile acting as though nothing has happened and tries to ingratiate himself with Roseanne by bringing her gifts, claims his actions were caused by tension and promises to help with repairs but returns to his lazy ways doing nothing as Rogan works.
Rogan tries again to discuss having a relationship with Roseanne, a conversation ended by them seeing a vulture flying in the sky (I assume it was a vulture from Rogans "filthy scavengers" comment) and we discover Eric has destroyed their attempt to grow crops (Charles tells Rogan but they choose to keep the information from Roseanne) and Rogan confronts him telling him to leave.
Eric reveals he has a gun and says he'll go when he wants to. Roseanne finally accepts her feelings for Rogan but calls him Steven as they are in a passionate embrace before realising her faux pas and leaving him looking like a lemon. Eric calls on Roseanne in the night and cons her into going with him by saying he doesn't know what her husband looks like (so the writer very convienently forgot the photograph Rogan found?) by playing off her emotions of Rogans desire to not leave.
Charles discovers Eric leaving & is murdered by Eric and it appears Roseanne had named her baby calling him Tony as she soothes him. Rogan discovers the body of Charles and the empty house with a note left by Roseanne. As they drive through the city she is haunted by the sound of sirens (imagined in her head I assumed to yet further reinforce her role as hopeless woman but they appeared to be real and must have been severly sapping whatever powered them).
She enters the building where her husband works (and we finally discover her surname is Rogers almost 2/3's of the way into the movie!) but she finds his office empty, she also returns to the hospital where she was getting her x-rays and we see a mark of the era as she is listed as "Mrs Steven Rogers" and not under her own name. She eventually discovers a body in the hospital waiting room and Eric reveals his true colours showing his impatience (stupidly asking "where have you been" knowing full well what the answer was) and showing off stolen jewellery to try and impress her.
He tells her his true motivation and she starts to walk away but when he runs after her she tears his shirt revealing he is suffering from radiation sickness causing him to freak out & abandon her completely. Roseanne starts back to the house on foot travelling for several days and I'm not exactly sure what causes her to start ripping off the babies clothes but I assume it was because he had died (from the radiation in the city or the water she was feeding him).
She does finally meet back up with Rogan who finds her sitting on the road rocking the baby in a rainstorm and she tells him the baby is dead. They return to the house and bury him next to Charles and the film just tails off after she goes to help him in their garden with another Bible quote "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth, And there shall be now more death, No more sorrow, No more tears. Behold! I make all things new" (Revelation 21).
Its not a great ending to a particularly good movie with far too many sterotypes and rather badly written roles for all involved. Worth a look at how 50's America felt and thought even if they are all rather outdated ideas & concepts now.